Data-backed planning intelligence · 2,500,000+ decisions analysed across England

Rear Extension Approval Rates in Buckinghamshire

Rear extensions are the bread and butter of UK planning — and one of the most common reasons homeowners face a refusal. Here's what 8,065 real decisions tell us about rear extension outcomes in Buckinghamshire.

8,065 real decisions·January 2020 to present·Updated March 2026
87.6%
Approval Rate
8,065
Decisions
7,068
Approved
997
Refused
87.6% approved. But 997 refused since 2020. Each refusal cost the homeowner time and money on drawings and application fees. Understanding your local data before you apply is the difference between confidence and a costly gamble.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Buckinghamshire

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

Why rear extension approval rates matter

Rear extensions sit in the middle of the pack nationally. They're common enough that councils have clear precedent — but that cuts both ways. If your neighbours have been refused, that precedent works against you too.

Ward gap in Buckinghamshire: Chalfont St Peter approves 85.7% of rear extension applications while Chalfont St Giles and Little Chalfont sits at 80.0%. That 5.7% gap means your postcode is one of the strongest indicators of outcome.

Rear Extension approval rate by ward

#WardDecisionsApprovedRate
1Chalfont St Peter76
85.7%
2Chalfont St Giles and Little Chalfont54
80.0%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

A rear extension has a 85.7% approval rate in Chalfont St Peter but just 80.0% in Chalfont St Giles and Little Chalfont.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

How rear extensions compare to other project types

Not all applications are treated equally. Here's how rear extensions stack up against other common projects in Buckinghamshire.

TypeDecisionsRate
Conservatory984
89.9%
Wraparound Extension784
89.2%
Front Extension2,338
89.0%
Basement264
88.3%
Side Extension4,548
88.2%
Rear Extension8,065
87.6%
Hip-to-Gable Conversion458
84.7%
Dormer2,756
84.4%
Loft Conversion1,728
84.0%
Garage / Parking5,995
83.7%
Extension (General)947
83.0%
Annex253
82.6%
Outbuilding1,920
82.0%
Flat Conversion146
79.5%
New Build1,352
76.8%
Change of Use (Residential)1,090
76.1%
HMO88
69.3%
See how this applies to your postcode →

What the data tells us

1
87.6% of rear extension applications in Buckinghamshire get approved. That means 997 homeowners since 2020 have been refused. Not terrible odds, but not a foregone conclusion.
2
Your ward matters more than you think. The 5.7% gap between Chalfont St Peter (85.7%) and Chalfont St Giles and Little Chalfont (80.0%) means your postcode is one of the strongest indicators of outcome.
3
Council averages are starting points, not guarantees. The decisions that matter most are the comparable ones near your specific property — because planning officers look at precedent, character and the immediate context of your street.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

997 rear extension applications in Buckinghamshire have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A £79 report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check My Postcode First
Free instant check · Pro Report £79 · Based on 2,500,000+ real decisions

More Buckinghamshire planning data

Nearby councils rear extension data

Methodology: Based on 8,065 planning decisions classified as rear extensions in Buckinghamshire, January 2020 to present. Classification uses keyword matching against proposal descriptions (matching generate_site_data.py rules). A single application may appear in multiple categories. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid applications excluded. Data from Buckinghamshire Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Buckinghamshire — Free