Data-backed planning intelligence · 3,840,000+ decisions analysed across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland
PlanningLens

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Buckinghamshire

Planning outcomes in Buckinghamshire are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 34.8% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

18,396 real decisions·120 wards·Updated September 2026
100.0%
Highest: Taplow
65.2%
Lowest: Former West Wycombe
34.8%
Gap
120
Wards
85.4% approved overall. But 2,680 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Buckinghamshire shifts your odds by up to 34.8%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Buckinghamshire

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 120 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Taplow11110
100.0%
2Berryfields, Buckingham Park and Watermead12120
100.0%
3Aylesbury East27270
100.0%
4Denham South12120
100.0%
5Gerrards Cross East Denham South West29281
96.6%
6Former Abbey21201
95.2%
7Aylesbury North West20191
95.0%
8Former Marlow19181
94.7%
9Beaconsfield North1281217
94.5%
10Ballinger South Heath And Chartridge82775
93.9%
11Seer Green1131067
93.8%
12Aylesbury South West15141
93.3%
13Gerrards Cross South72675
93.1%
14Wendover, Halton and Stoke Mandeville42393
92.9%
15Beaconsfield West22721017
92.5%
16Aston Clinton and Weston Turville38353
92.1%
17Beaconsfield South18517015
91.9%
18Farnham Royal24222
91.7%
19Chalfont St Giles29026525
91.4%
20St Marys And Waterside12611511
91.3%
21Former Chiltern Villages34313
91.2%
22Gold Hill56515
91.1%
23Chesham Bois And Weedon Hill21219220
90.6%
24Amersham Common84768
90.5%
25Great Missenden73667
90.4%
26Former Beaconsfield63657561
90.4%
27Hazlemere65358964
90.2%
28Former Amersham and Chesham Bois39635739
90.2%
29Penn And Coleshill23020723
90.0%
30Marlow1,5341,370164
89.3%
31West Wycombe and Lane End33029436
89.1%
32Chalfont Common12911514
89.1%
33Little Chalfont17315419
89.0%
34Former Penn Wood & Old Amersham49644155
88.9%
35Penn, Tylers Green and Loudwater61954970
88.7%
36Little Missenden71638
88.7%
37Amersham Town15914118
88.7%
38Farnham And Hedgerley25622630
88.3%
39Former Chalfont St Peter43438351
88.2%
40Grendon Underwood and The Claydons42375
88.1%
41Iver Heath16314320
87.7%
42Gerrards Cross30726938
87.6%
43Flackwell Heath and The Wooburns1,141998143
87.5%
44Former Chalfont St Giles55748770
87.4%
45Abbey931811120
87.1%
46Prestwood And Heath End13812018
87.0%
47Aylesbury West15132
86.7%
48Long Crendon30264
86.7%
49Former Gerrards Cross55648076
86.3%
50Former Great Missenden35430549
86.2%
51Chesham South877512
86.2%
52Chiltern Villages915788127
86.1%
53Marsh and Micklefield31527144
86.0%
54Ivinghoe50437
86.0%
55Central15513322
85.8%
56The Missendens18916227
85.7%
57Amersham On The Hill13211319
85.6%
58Denham22118932
85.5%
59Bierton, Kingsbrook and Wing34295
85.3%
60Burnham Church And Beeches18916128
85.2%
61Iver Village And Richings Park20817731
85.1%
62Cholesbury, The Lee, Bellingdon12110318
85.1%
63Haddenham and Stone47407
85.1%
64Disraeli18615828
84.9%
65Former Iver37031357
84.6%
66Terriers and Amersham Hill49641779
84.1%
67Totteridge and Bowerdean37731760
84.1%
68Austenwood1008416
84.0%
69Chalfont St Peter12510520
84.0%
70Former Chiltern Ridges37831761
83.9%
71Former Little Chalfont & Amersham Common41735067
83.9%
72Former Ridgeway East37316
83.8%
73Downley28924247
83.7%
74Gerrards Cross North615110
83.6%
75Former Denham41834969
83.5%
76Beaconsfield24820741
83.5%
77Former Farnham Common & Burnham Beeches36230260
83.4%
78Amersham and Chesham Bois21818137
83.0%
79Ashley Green Latimer And Chenies1119219
82.9%
80Buckingham584810
82.8%
81Ridgeway23194
82.6%
82Burnham Church17143
82.4%
83Booker and Cressex22618640
82.3%
84Former Chesham26922148
82.2%
85Quainton39327
82.1%
86Princes Risborough756620136
82.0%
87Stoke Poges16713631
81.4%
88Hilltop And Townsend977918
81.4%
89Wexham And Fulmer756114
81.3%
90Former Cliveden31525659
81.3%
91Burnham Lent Rise And Taplow23419044
81.2%
92Newton Longville48399
81.2%
93Aylesbury North32266
81.2%
94Aylesbury South East32266
81.2%
95Holmer Green957718
81.1%
96Chesham North1229923
81.1%
97Vale36297
80.6%
98Former Chess Valley34928168
80.5%
99Ridgeway West919739180
80.4%
100Former The Risboroughs30246
80.0%
101Asheridge Vale And Lowndes856817
80.0%
102Waddesdon45369
80.0%
103Wexham And Iver West20164
80.0%
104Ridgeway East872693179
79.5%
105Former Stoke Poges & Wexham47137398
79.2%
106Iver15712433
79.0%
107Former The Wooburns, Bourne End and Hedsor19154
78.9%
108Castlefield and Oakridge34927574
78.8%
109Horwood33267
78.8%
110Chalfont St Giles and Little Chalfont24919653
78.7%
111Gerrards Cross and Denham28322063
77.7%
112Sands21316548
77.5%
113Winslow22175
77.3%
114Burnham18414242
77.2%
115Newtown38299
76.3%
116Hedgerley And Fulmer24186
75.0%
117Farnhams and Stoke Poges21815662
71.6%
118Former Ridgeway West14104
71.4%
119Former Tylers Green and Loudwater14104
71.4%
120Former West Wycombe23158
65.2%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Taplow but face serious resistance in Former West Wycombe.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 34.8% gap separates the best and worst wards. Taplow approves 100.0% of applications while Former West Wycombe approves just 65.2%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

2,680 planning applications in Buckinghamshire have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check my postcode
Free · Property report emailed in minutes · Based on 3,840,000+ real decisions

More Buckinghamshire planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 18,396 planning decisions in Buckinghamshire, January 2020 to September 2026. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Buckinghamshire Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Buckinghamshire — Free