Planning outcomes in Cannock Chase are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 19.1% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.
See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.
| # | Ward | Decisions | Approved | Refused | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cannock South Ward, Cannock East Ward | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Cannock South Ward, Norton Canes Ward | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 3 | Hawks Green Ward, Cannock South Ward, Norton Canes Ward, Cannock East Ward | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 4 | Brereton & Ravenhill | 59 | 57 | 2 | 96.6% |
| 5 | Heath Hayes & Wimblebury | 56 | 54 | 2 | 96.4% |
| 6 | Hawks Green Ward | 156 | 149 | 7 | 95.5% |
| 7 | Cannock West Ward | 395 | 377 | 18 | 95.4% |
| 8 | Heath Hayes East and Wimblebury Ward | 147 | 140 | 7 | 95.2% |
| 9 | Western Springs Ward | 284 | 270 | 14 | 95.1% |
| 10 | Chadsmoor | 53 | 50 | 3 | 94.3% |
| 11 | Hagley Ward | 106 | 100 | 6 | 94.3% |
| 12 | Hednesford North Ward | 171 | 161 | 10 | 94.2% |
| 13 | Hednesford South | 17 | 16 | 1 | 94.1% |
| 14 | Norton Canes | 165 | 155 | 10 | 93.9% |
| 15 | Cannock South Ward | 377 | 353 | 24 | 93.6% |
| 16 | Hednesford Green Heath Ward | 184 | 172 | 12 | 93.5% |
| 17 | Brereton and Ravenhill Ward | 234 | 218 | 16 | 93.2% |
| 18 | Hawks Green with Rumer Hill | 43 | 40 | 3 | 93.0% |
| 19 | Etching Hill and The Heath Ward | 211 | 196 | 15 | 92.9% |
| 20 | Etching HIll & the Heath | 83 | 77 | 6 | 92.8% |
| 21 | Norton Canes Ward | 344 | 319 | 25 | 92.7% |
| 22 | Hednesford South Ward | 147 | 136 | 11 | 92.5% |
| 23 | Cannock North Ward | 120 | 111 | 9 | 92.5% |
| 24 | Cannock East Ward | 187 | 172 | 15 | 92.0% |
| 25 | Hednesford Pye Green | 60 | 55 | 5 | 91.7% |
| 26 | Rawnsley Ward | 218 | 200 | 18 | 91.7% |
| 27 | Western Springs | 214 | 196 | 18 | 91.6% |
| 28 | Hednesford Green Heath | 103 | 94 | 9 | 91.3% |
| 29 | Hawks Green | 33 | 30 | 3 | 90.9% |
| 30 | Cannock East | 40 | 36 | 4 | 90.0% |
| 31 | Norton Canes Ward, Heath Hayes East and Wimblebury Ward | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% |
| 32 | Brereton and Ravenhill | 56 | 50 | 6 | 89.3% |
| 33 | Cannock Park & Old Fallow | 111 | 99 | 12 | 89.2% |
| 34 | Heath Hayes East and Wimblebury | 45 | 40 | 5 | 88.9% |
| 35 | Cannock West | 116 | 103 | 13 | 88.8% |
| 36 | Cannock South | 70 | 62 | 8 | 88.6% |
| 37 | Cannock Longford & Bridgtown | 124 | 109 | 15 | 87.9% |
| 38 | Cannock North | 23 | 20 | 3 | 87.0% |
| 39 | Rawnsley | 53 | 45 | 8 | 84.9% |
| 40 | Etching Hill and The Heath | 59 | 49 | 10 | 83.1% |
| 41 | Hednesford Hills & Rawnsley | 84 | 69 | 15 | 82.1% |
| 42 | Hagley | 28 | 23 | 5 | 82.1% |
| 43 | Hednesford North | 47 | 38 | 9 | 80.9% |
An extension might sail through in Cannock South Ward, Cannock East Ward but face serious resistance in Hednesford North.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.
411 planning applications in Cannock Chase have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.
Check my postcode