Planning outcomes in Cannock Chase are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 19.1% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.
See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.
| # | Ward | Decisions | Approved | Refused | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cannock South Ward, Cannock East Ward | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Cannock South Ward, Norton Canes Ward | 11 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 3 | Hawks Green Ward, Cannock South Ward, Norton Canes Ward, Cannock East Ward | 12 | 12 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 4 | Brereton & Ravenhill | 66 | 63 | 3 | 95.5% |
| 5 | Hawks Green Ward | 156 | 149 | 7 | 95.5% |
| 6 | Cannock West Ward | 395 | 377 | 18 | 95.4% |
| 7 | Heath Hayes East and Wimblebury Ward | 147 | 140 | 7 | 95.2% |
| 8 | Western Springs Ward | 284 | 270 | 14 | 95.1% |
| 9 | Heath Hayes & Wimblebury | 60 | 57 | 3 | 95.0% |
| 10 | Chadsmoor | 57 | 54 | 3 | 94.7% |
| 11 | Norton Canes | 175 | 165 | 10 | 94.3% |
| 12 | Hagley Ward | 106 | 100 | 6 | 94.3% |
| 13 | Hednesford North Ward | 171 | 161 | 10 | 94.2% |
| 14 | Hednesford South | 17 | 16 | 1 | 94.1% |
| 15 | Hawks Green with Rumer Hill | 47 | 44 | 3 | 93.6% |
| 16 | Cannock South Ward | 377 | 353 | 24 | 93.6% |
| 17 | Hednesford Green Heath Ward | 184 | 172 | 12 | 93.5% |
| 18 | Brereton and Ravenhill Ward | 234 | 218 | 16 | 93.2% |
| 19 | Etching Hill and The Heath Ward | 211 | 196 | 15 | 92.9% |
| 20 | Norton Canes Ward | 344 | 319 | 25 | 92.7% |
| 21 | Hednesford South Ward | 147 | 136 | 11 | 92.5% |
| 22 | Cannock North Ward | 120 | 111 | 9 | 92.5% |
| 23 | Etching HIll & the Heath | 91 | 84 | 7 | 92.3% |
| 24 | Cannock East Ward | 187 | 172 | 15 | 92.0% |
| 25 | Rawnsley Ward | 218 | 200 | 18 | 91.7% |
| 26 | Hednesford Green Heath | 105 | 96 | 9 | 91.4% |
| 27 | Western Springs | 226 | 206 | 20 | 91.2% |
| 28 | Hawks Green | 33 | 30 | 3 | 90.9% |
| 29 | Cannock East | 40 | 36 | 4 | 90.0% |
| 30 | Norton Canes Ward, Heath Hayes East and Wimblebury Ward | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% |
| 31 | Brereton and Ravenhill | 56 | 50 | 6 | 89.3% |
| 32 | Heath Hayes East and Wimblebury | 45 | 40 | 5 | 88.9% |
| 33 | Cannock West | 116 | 103 | 13 | 88.8% |
| 34 | Cannock South | 70 | 62 | 8 | 88.6% |
| 35 | Cannock Park & Old Fallow | 116 | 102 | 14 | 87.9% |
| 36 | Hednesford Pye Green | 66 | 58 | 8 | 87.9% |
| 37 | Cannock Longford & Bridgtown | 132 | 116 | 16 | 87.9% |
| 38 | Cannock North | 23 | 20 | 3 | 87.0% |
| 39 | Rawnsley | 53 | 45 | 8 | 84.9% |
| 40 | Etching Hill and The Heath | 59 | 49 | 10 | 83.1% |
| 41 | Hednesford Hills & Rawnsley | 91 | 75 | 16 | 82.4% |
| 42 | Hagley | 28 | 23 | 5 | 82.1% |
| 43 | Hednesford North | 47 | 38 | 9 | 80.9% |
An extension might sail through in Cannock South Ward, Cannock East Ward but face serious resistance in Hednesford North.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.
361 planning applications in Cannock Chase have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.
Check my postcode