Data-backed planning intelligence · 2,500,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Cannock Chase

Planning outcomes in Cannock Chase are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 20.8% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

2,556 real decisions·40 wards·Updated March 2026
100.0%
Highest: Brereton & Ravenhill
79.2%
Lowest: Hednesford Hills & R
20.8%
Gap
40
Wards
89.9% approved overall. But 258 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Cannock Chase shifts your odds by up to 20.8%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Cannock Chase

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 40 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Brereton & Ravenhill47470
100.0%
2Cannock South Ward, Cannock East Ward10100
100.0%
3Hagley Ward34331
97.1%
4Cannock West Ward76733
96.1%
5Heath Hayes & Wimblebury42402
95.2%
6Hawks Green Ward39372
94.9%
7Etching HIll & the Heath73694
94.5%
8Hednesford South17161
94.1%
9Norton Canes1391309
93.5%
10Chadsmoor43403
93.0%
11Hednesford Green Heath Ward63585
92.1%
12Hednesford North Ward38353
92.1%
13Western Springs19117516
91.6%
14Etching Hill and The Heath Ward47434
91.5%
15Hednesford Green Heath92848
91.3%
16Hednesford Pye Green45414
91.1%
17Hawks Green33303
90.9%
18Cannock North Ward33303
90.9%
19Cannock East Ward42384
90.5%
20Cannock East40364
90.0%
21Cannock West11810612
89.8%
22Brereton and Ravenhill58526
89.7%
23Hawks Green with Rumer Hill39354
89.7%
24Cannock South Ward78708
89.7%
25Rawnsley Ward39354
89.7%
26Hednesford South Ward38344
89.5%
27Western Springs Ward64577
89.1%
28Heath Hayes East and Wimblebury45405
88.9%
29Norton Canes Ward908010
88.9%
30Cannock South71638
88.7%
31Brereton and Ravenhill Ward56497
87.5%
32Cannock Longford & Bridgtown1008713
87.0%
33Cannock Park & Old Fallow928012
87.0%
34Cannock North23203
87.0%
35Rawnsley54468
85.2%
36Heath Hayes East and Wimblebury Ward27234
85.2%
37Etching Hill and The Heath615110
83.6%
38Hagley28235
82.1%
39Hednesford North48399
81.2%
40Hednesford Hills & Rawnsley776116
79.2%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Brereton & Ravenhill but face serious resistance in Hednesford Hills & Rawnsley.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 20.8% gap separates the best and worst wards. Brereton & Ravenhill approves 100.0% of applications while Hednesford Hills & Rawnsley approves just 79.2%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

258 planning applications in Cannock Chase have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A £79 report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check My Postcode First
Free instant check · Pro Report £79 · Based on 2,500,000+ real decisions

More Cannock Chase planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 2,556 planning decisions in Cannock Chase, January 2020 to present. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Cannock Chase Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Cannock Chase — Free