Data-backed planning intelligence · 3,780,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in County Durham

Planning outcomes in County Durham are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 24.0% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

15,557 real decisions·113 wards·Updated August 2026
100.0%
Highest: Horden (Historic)
76.0%
Lowest: Annfield Plain And T
24.0%
Gap
113
Wards
94.9% approved overall. But 801 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in County Durham shifts your odds by up to 24.0%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in County Durham

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 113 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Horden (Historic)54540
100.0%
2Deneside (Historic)50500
100.0%
3Ferryhill52520
100.0%
4Castle Eden And Passfield42420
100.0%
5Aycliffe North And Middridge22220
100.0%
6Pittington And Sherburn19190
100.0%
7Peterlee16160
100.0%
8Bishop Middleham And Cornforth (Historic)78771
98.7%
9Bishop Auckland Town (Historic)2762724
98.6%
10Barnard Castle65641
98.5%
11Lumley And West Rainton67661
98.5%
12Chester-le-Street South1221202
98.4%
13Chester-le-Street North (Historic)53521
98.1%
14Passfield (Historic)54531
98.1%
15Sacriston And Witton Gilbert49481
98.0%
16Spennymoor51501
98.0%
17Tudhoe50491
98.0%
18Consett North (Historic)1251223
97.6%
19Chester-le-Street East (Historic)80782
97.5%
20Durham South (Historic)1631594
97.5%
21West Auckland (Historic)1961915
97.4%
22Peterlee East (Historic)74722
97.3%
23Barnard Castle West (Historic)79177021
97.3%
24Framwellgate And Newton Hall (Historic)3012938
97.3%
25Sedgefield (Historic)36935910
97.3%
26Esh And Witton Gilbert (Historic)2602537
97.3%
27Aycliffe West (Historic)36351
97.2%
28Lumley (Historic)1701655
97.1%
29Woodhouse Close (Historic)100973
97.0%
30Crook (Historic)1911856
96.9%
31Barnard Castle East (Historic)60758720
96.7%
32Belmont (Historic)36235012
96.7%
33Spennymoor (Historic)1831776
96.7%
34Seaham (Historic)1441395
96.5%
35Stanley (Historic)55532
96.4%
36Aycliffe East (Historic)1931867
96.4%
37Dalton And Dawdon28271
96.4%
38Aycliffe North And Middridge (Historic)77743
96.1%
39Chilton (Historic)101974
96.0%
40Peterlee West (Historic)73703
95.9%
41Sacriston (Historic)1211165
95.9%
42Deerness (Historic)2152069
95.8%
43North Lodge24231
95.8%
44Sherburn (Historic)2112029
95.7%
45Weardale (Historic)65162328
95.7%
46Shildon And Dene Valley (Historic)2081999
95.7%
47Chester-le-Street West Central (Historic)1111065
95.5%
48Tow Law (Historic)1061015
95.3%
49Benfieldside (Historic)1911829
95.3%
50Framwellgate And Newton Hall85814
95.3%
51Tudhoe (Historic)1891809
95.2%
52Easington (Historic)1891809
95.2%
53Consett North21201
95.2%
54Pelton42402
95.2%
55Bishop Auckland82784
95.1%
56Coxhoe (Historic)32030416
95.0%
57Trimdon And Thornley (Historic)1801719
95.0%
58Brandon40382
95.0%
59Stanley39372
94.9%
60North Lodge (Historic)1111056
94.6%
61Delves Lane (Historic)92875
94.6%
62Aycliffe South74704
94.6%
63Burnopfield And Dipton (Historic)1411338
94.3%
64Brandon (Historic)18517411
94.1%
65Chilton17161
94.1%
66West Auckland68644
94.1%
67Pelton (Historic)16215210
93.8%
68Annfield Plain (Historic)80755
93.8%
69Coundon (Historic)64604
93.8%
70Murton (Historic)1291218
93.8%
71Blackhalls And Hesledens16151
93.8%
72Leadgate And Medomsley (Historic)31829820
93.7%
73Evenwood (Historic)33331221
93.7%
74Ferryhill (Historic)1111047
93.7%
75Neville's Cross1271198
93.7%
76Benfieldside47443
93.6%
77Murton61574
93.4%
78Elvet And Gilesgate (Historic)82176655
93.3%
79Elvet, Gilesgate And Shincliffe23521916
93.2%
80Lanchester (Historic)36433925
93.1%
81Craghead And South Moor (Historic)58544
93.1%
82Consett South (Historic)43403
93.0%
83Bowburn And Coxhoe98917
92.9%
84Tanfield (Historic)16615412
92.8%
85Chester-le-Street North41383
92.7%
86Deerness53494
92.5%
87Dawdon (Historic)13212210
92.4%
88Upper Teesdale17215913
92.4%
89Neville's Cross (Historic)60655947
92.2%
90Easington And Shotton76706
92.1%
91Derwent And Pont Valley85787
91.8%
92Thornley And Wheatley Hill36333
91.7%
93Langley And Esh48444
91.7%
94Belmont94868
91.5%
95Blackhalls (Historic)20618818
91.3%
96Willington And Hunwick (Historic)24021921
91.2%
97Shildon And Dene Valley57525
91.2%
98Lanchester And Burnhope68626
91.2%
99Wingate (Historic)44404
90.9%
100Shotton And South Hetton (Historic)11910811
90.8%
101Weardale13111912
90.8%
102Lower Teesdale13111912
90.8%
103Trimdon And Wingate41374
90.2%
104Delves Lane30273
90.0%
105Craghead And South Moor1091
90.0%
106Sedgefield87789
89.7%
107Consett South19172
89.5%
108Willington And Hunwick47416
87.2%
109Crook847212
85.7%
110Evenwood49427
85.7%
111Horden And Dene House32266
81.2%
112Seaham30246
80.0%
113Annfield Plain And Tanfield25196
76.0%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Horden (Historic) but face serious resistance in Annfield Plain And Tanfield.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 24.0% gap separates the best and worst wards. Horden (Historic) approves 100.0% of applications while Annfield Plain And Tanfield approves just 76.0%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

801 planning applications in County Durham have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check my postcode
Free · Property report emailed in minutes · Based on 3,780,000+ real decisions

More County Durham planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 15,557 planning decisions in County Durham, January 2020 to August 2026. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from County Durham Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in County Durham — Free