Data-backed planning intelligence · 2,500,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Mid Sussex

Planning outcomes in Mid Sussex are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 11.4% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

7,819 real decisions·28 wards·Updated March 2026
97.6%
Highest: Burgess Hill - Meeds
86.2%
Lowest: Ashurst Wood And Eas
11.4%
Gap
28
Wards
94.0% approved overall. But 472 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Mid Sussex shifts your odds by up to 11.4%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Mid Sussex

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 28 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Burgess Hill - Meeds And Hammonds84822
97.6%
2Handcross And Pease Pottage33321
97.0%
3East Grinstead - Baldwins1511465
96.7%
4Burgess Hill - Victoria1741686
96.6%
5Burgess Hill - Dunstall1431385
96.5%
6Haywards Heath - Lucastes And Bolnore1071034
96.3%
7East Grinstead - Herontye1581526
96.2%
8Burgess Hill - Leylands1061024
96.2%
9East Grinstead - Ashplats1921848
95.8%
10East Grinstead - Town29828414
95.3%
11Haywards Heath - Bentswood And Heath83794
95.2%
12East Grinstead - Imberhorne24523312
95.1%
13Lindfield52750027
94.9%
14Downland Villages1371298
94.2%
15Crawley Down35533421
94.1%
16--1,9541,838116
94.1%
17Haywards Heath - Franklands25724116
93.8%
18Lindfield Rural And High Weald22320914
93.7%
19Burgess Hill - St Andrews18817612
93.6%
20Haywards Heath - Ashenground17216111
93.6%
21Burgess Hill - Franklands32730522
93.3%
22Hassocks45942633
92.8%
23Ardingly, Balcombe And Turners Hill22120516
92.8%
24Hurstpierpoint58754443
92.7%
25Copthorne And Worth29827226
91.3%
26Haywards Heath - North41374
90.2%
27Cuckfield, Bolney And Ansty23621224
89.8%
28Ashurst Wood And East Grinstead South58508
86.2%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Burgess Hill - Meeds And Hammonds but face serious resistance in Ashurst Wood And East Grinstead South.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 11.4% gap separates the best and worst wards. Burgess Hill - Meeds And Hammonds approves 97.6% of applications while Ashurst Wood And East Grinstead South approves just 86.2%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

472 planning applications in Mid Sussex have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A £79 report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check My Postcode First
Free instant check · Pro Report £79 · Based on 2,500,000+ real decisions

More Mid Sussex planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 7,819 planning decisions in Mid Sussex, January 2020 to present. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Mid Sussex Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Mid Sussex — Free