Data-backed planning intelligence · 3,780,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Mid Sussex

Planning outcomes in Mid Sussex are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 11.4% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

8,785 real decisions·28 wards·Updated August 2026
97.8%
Highest: Handcross And Pease
86.4%
Lowest: Ashurst Wood And Eas
11.4%
Gap
28
Wards
93.9% approved overall. But 539 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Mid Sussex shifts your odds by up to 11.4%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Mid Sussex

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 28 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Handcross And Pease Pottage46451
97.8%
2Burgess Hill - Meeds And Hammonds1081053
97.2%
3Burgess Hill - Dunstall1801755
97.2%
4East Grinstead - Baldwins1631585
96.9%
5Haywards Heath - Bentswood And Heath1201164
96.7%
6Haywards Heath - Lucastes And Bolnore1421375
96.5%
7East Grinstead - Herontye1731676
96.5%
8Burgess Hill - Leylands1301255
96.2%
9Burgess Hill - Victoria1971898
95.9%
10East Grinstead - Ashplats2142059
95.8%
11East Grinstead - Imberhorne26625313
95.1%
12East Grinstead - Town33131417
94.9%
13Lindfield58855632
94.6%
14Crawley Down39136823
94.1%
15--1,9541,838116
94.1%
16Haywards Heath - Franklands27726017
93.9%
17Haywards Heath - Ashenground19117912
93.7%
18Burgess Hill - St Andrews20018713
93.5%
19Hassocks50747334
93.3%
20Downland Villages17616412
93.2%
21Burgess Hill - Franklands36934326
93.0%
22Hurstpierpoint65060446
92.9%
23Lindfield Rural And High Weald30628323
92.5%
24Ardingly, Balcombe And Turners Hill30628323
92.5%
25Haywards Heath - North52484
92.3%
26Copthorne And Worth32930128
91.5%
27Cuckfield, Bolney And Ansty33229438
88.6%
28Ashurst Wood And East Grinstead South817011
86.4%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Handcross And Pease Pottage but face serious resistance in Ashurst Wood And East Grinstead South.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 11.4% gap separates the best and worst wards. Handcross And Pease Pottage approves 97.8% of applications while Ashurst Wood And East Grinstead South approves just 86.4%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

539 planning applications in Mid Sussex have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check my postcode
Free · Property report emailed in minutes · Based on 3,780,000+ real decisions

More Mid Sussex planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 8,785 planning decisions in Mid Sussex, January 2020 to August 2026. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Mid Sussex Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Mid Sussex — Free