Data-backed planning intelligence · 3,290,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Mid Sussex

Planning outcomes in Mid Sussex are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 9.9% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

8,479 real decisions·28 wards·Updated June 2026
97.6%
Highest: Handcross And Pease
87.7%
Lowest: Ashurst Wood And Eas
9.9%
Gap
28
Wards
93.9% approved overall. But 516 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Mid Sussex shifts your odds by up to 9.9%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Mid Sussex

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 28 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Handcross And Pease Pottage42411
97.6%
2Burgess Hill - Dunstall1711665
97.1%
3Burgess Hill - Meeds And Hammonds101983
97.0%
4East Grinstead - Baldwins1571525
96.8%
5Haywards Heath - Bentswood And Heath1101064
96.4%
6East Grinstead - Herontye1651596
96.4%
7Haywards Heath - Lucastes And Bolnore1291245
96.1%
8Burgess Hill - Leylands1241195
96.0%
9Burgess Hill - Victoria1891818
95.8%
10East Grinstead - Ashplats2071989
95.7%
11East Grinstead - Town31930415
95.3%
12East Grinstead - Imberhorne26425113
95.1%
13Lindfield56653531
94.5%
14--1,9541,838116
94.1%
15Crawley Down38235923
94.0%
16Burgess Hill - St Andrews19418212
93.8%
17Haywards Heath - Franklands27125417
93.7%
18Burgess Hill - Franklands35333023
93.5%
19Haywards Heath - Ashenground18116912
93.4%
20Downland Villages16715611
93.4%
21Lindfield Rural And High Weald28326419
93.3%
22Hassocks49446034
93.1%
23Hurstpierpoint62858444
93.0%
24Ardingly, Balcombe And Turners Hill28226220
92.9%
25Haywards Heath - North51474
92.2%
26Copthorne And Worth31829028
91.2%
27Cuckfield, Bolney And Ansty29826434
88.6%
28Ashurst Wood And East Grinstead South73649
87.7%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Handcross And Pease Pottage but face serious resistance in Ashurst Wood And East Grinstead South.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 9.9% gap separates the best and worst wards. Handcross And Pease Pottage approves 97.6% of applications while Ashurst Wood And East Grinstead South approves just 87.7%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

516 planning applications in Mid Sussex have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check my postcode
Free · Property report emailed in minutes · Based on 3,290,000+ real decisions

More Mid Sussex planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 8,479 planning decisions in Mid Sussex, January 2020 to present. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Mid Sussex Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Mid Sussex — Free