Data-backed planning intelligence · 3,780,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Rushcliffe

Planning outcomes in Rushcliffe are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 17.2% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

7,992 real decisions·30 wards·Updated August 2026
98.6%
Highest: Newton
81.4%
Lowest: Sutton Bonington (ar
17.2%
Gap
30
Wards
89.3% approved overall. But 857 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Rushcliffe shifts your odds by up to 17.2%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Rushcliffe

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 30 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Newton70691
98.6%
2Gamston South (archive)42411
97.6%
3Gamston77734
94.8%
4East Bridgford36434123
93.7%
5Lady Bay34832622
93.7%
6Bingham West (archive)56524
92.9%
7Radcliffe On Trent48044436
92.5%
8Bingham South53494
92.5%
9Compton Acres27725423
91.7%
10Soar Valley11010010
90.9%
11Musters35432133
90.7%
12Bingham East (archive)15013614
90.7%
13Bunny40836840
90.2%
14Abbey39635739
90.2%
15Keyworth And Wolds59753562
89.6%
16Lutterell25022426
89.6%
17Bingham North1039211
89.3%
18Thoroton (archive)27924732
88.5%
19Cranmer28425133
88.4%
20Cropwell25021931
87.6%
21Trent Bridge36732146
87.5%
22Cotgrave23120229
87.4%
23Gotham25222032
87.3%
24Ruddington53146368
87.2%
25Nevile And Langar46040060
87.0%
26Leake35130546
86.9%
27Edwalton39133952
86.7%
28Tollerton25922138
85.3%
29Gamston North (archive)776413
83.1%
30Sutton Bonington (archive)1189622
81.4%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Newton but face serious resistance in Sutton Bonington (archive).
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 17.2% gap separates the best and worst wards. Newton approves 98.6% of applications while Sutton Bonington (archive) approves just 81.4%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

857 planning applications in Rushcliffe have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check my postcode
Free · Property report emailed in minutes · Based on 3,780,000+ real decisions

More Rushcliffe planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 7,992 planning decisions in Rushcliffe, January 2020 to August 2026. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Rushcliffe Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Rushcliffe — Free