Data-backed planning intelligence · 2,500,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Rushcliffe

Planning outcomes in Rushcliffe are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 17.1% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

7,470 real decisions·30 wards·Updated March 2026
98.5%
Highest: Newton
81.4%
Lowest: Sutton Bonington (ar
17.1%
Gap
30
Wards
88.8% approved overall. But 836 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Rushcliffe shifts your odds by up to 17.1%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Rushcliffe

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 30 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Newton66651
98.5%
2Gamston South (archive)42411
97.6%
3Gamston60573
95.0%
4Lady Bay32730522
93.3%
5East Bridgford33931623
93.2%
6Bingham West (archive)56524
92.9%
7Radcliffe On Trent45241636
92.0%
8Bingham South44404
90.9%
9Compton Acres24722423
90.7%
10Bingham East (archive)15013614
90.7%
11Soar Valley96879
90.6%
12Bunny37834236
90.5%
13Musters33330033
90.1%
14Abbey36432638
89.6%
15Lutterell23821325
89.5%
16Keyworth And Wolds55449559
89.4%
17Thoroton (archive)27924732
88.5%
18Cranmer25322231
87.7%
19Trent Bridge35030644
87.4%
20Cotgrave21919128
87.2%
21Cropwell24121031
87.1%
22Gotham23620531
86.9%
23Leake34129645
86.8%
24Ruddington48441965
86.6%
25Bingham North827111
86.6%
26Nevile And Langar42636660
85.9%
27Edwalton36531352
85.8%
28Tollerton24620838
84.6%
29Gamston North (archive)776413
83.1%
30Sutton Bonington (archive)1189622
81.4%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Newton but face serious resistance in Sutton Bonington (archive).
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 17.1% gap separates the best and worst wards. Newton approves 98.5% of applications while Sutton Bonington (archive) approves just 81.4%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

836 planning applications in Rushcliffe have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A £79 report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check My Postcode First
Free instant check · Pro Report £79 · Based on 2,500,000+ real decisions

More Rushcliffe planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 7,470 planning decisions in Rushcliffe, January 2020 to present. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Rushcliffe Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Rushcliffe — Free