Data-backed planning intelligence · 2,500,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Waltham Forest

Planning outcomes in Waltham Forest are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 30.2% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

21,278 real decisions·44 wards·Updated March 2026
99.1%
Highest: LEYTON
68.9%
Lowest: Hale End and Highams
30.2%
Gap
44
Wards
79.1% approved overall. But 4,447 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Waltham Forest shifts your odds by up to 30.2%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Waltham Forest

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 44 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1LEYTON2132112
99.1%
2HIGHAM HILL1521493
98.0%
3MARKHOUSE1991954
98.0%
4CATHALL1901864
97.9%
5VALLEY1101073
97.3%
6WILLIAM MORRIS1451414
97.2%
7GROVE GREEN2822748
97.2%
8LEA BRIDGE2392327
97.1%
9CANN HALL1641595
97.0%
10CHAPEL END1241204
96.8%
11WOOD STREET1891836
96.8%
12ENDLEBURY89863
96.6%
13CHINGFORD GREEN1381335
96.4%
14HALE END AND HIGHAMS PARK98944
95.9%
15HATCH LANE72693
95.8%
16HOE STREET28627412
95.8%
17LEYTONSTONE27526312
95.6%
18HIGH STREET25924712
95.4%
19LARKSWOOD92866
93.5%
20FOREST24922722
91.2%
21Hatch Lane988216
83.7%
22Wood Street25320845
82.2%
23Chapel End25821147
81.8%
24Markhouse20316340
80.3%
25Hoe Street28823058
79.9%
26Hatch Lane & Highams Park North1048321
79.8%
27Upper Walthamstow967620
79.2%
28Hale End and Highams Park1149024
78.9%
29High Street23518550
78.7%
30Larkswood19615442
78.6%
31Forest21616848
77.8%
32Endlebury18914445
76.2%
33Cann Hall22717354
76.2%
34William Morris22917455
76.0%
35Grove Green27520966
76.0%
36Leyton21315756
73.7%
37Leytonstone29421579
73.1%
38St James1198732
73.1%
39Chingford Green24117665
73.0%
40Higham Hill16812246
72.6%
41Cathall1359837
72.6%
42Lea Bridge23716869
70.9%
43Valley19413757
70.6%
44Hale End and Highams Park South614219
68.9%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in LEYTON but face serious resistance in Hale End and Highams Park South.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 30.2% gap separates the best and worst wards. LEYTON approves 99.1% of applications while Hale End and Highams Park South approves just 68.9%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

4,447 planning applications in Waltham Forest have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A £79 report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check My Postcode First
Free instant check · Pro Report £79 · Based on 2,500,000+ real decisions

More Waltham Forest planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 21,278 planning decisions in Waltham Forest, January 2020 to present. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Waltham Forest Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Waltham Forest — Free