Data-backed planning intelligence · 3,780,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Buckinghamshire

Planning outcomes in Buckinghamshire are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 34.8% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

25,837 real decisions·119 wards·Updated August 2026
100.0%
Highest: Taplow
65.2%
Lowest: Former West Wycombe
34.8%
Gap
119
Wards
85.4% approved overall. But 3,765 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Buckinghamshire shifts your odds by up to 34.8%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Buckinghamshire

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 119 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Taplow11110
100.0%
2Berryfields, Buckingham Park and Watermead11110
100.0%
3Aylesbury North West13130
100.0%
4Aylesbury East16160
100.0%
5Denham South12120
100.0%
6Wendover, Halton and Stoke Mandeville36351
97.2%
7Gerrards Cross East Denham South West29281
96.6%
8Former Abbey21201
95.2%
9Former Marlow19181
94.7%
10Beaconsfield North1281217
94.5%
11Ballinger South Heath And Chartridge82775
93.9%
12Seer Green1131067
93.8%
13Gerrards Cross South72675
93.1%
14Aston Clinton and Weston Turville27252
92.6%
15Beaconsfield West22721017
92.5%
16Beaconsfield South18517015
91.9%
17Farnham Royal24222
91.7%
18Chalfont St Giles29026525
91.4%
19St Marys And Waterside12611511
91.3%
20Bierton, Kingsbrook and Wing23212
91.3%
21Former Chiltern Villages34313
91.2%
22Gold Hill56515
91.1%
23Aylesbury South West11101
90.9%
24Chesham Bois And Weedon Hill21219220
90.6%
25Hazlemere63357360
90.5%
26Amersham Common84768
90.5%
27Great Missenden73667
90.4%
28Former Beaconsfield63657561
90.4%
29Former Amersham and Chesham Bois39535639
90.1%
30Penn And Coleshill23020723
90.0%
31Marlow1,4891,328161
89.2%
32West Wycombe and Lane End32328835
89.2%
33Chalfont Common12911514
89.1%
34Penn, Tylers Green and Loudwater59152665
89.0%
35Little Chalfont17315419
89.0%
36Former Penn Wood & Old Amersham49443955
88.9%
37Little Missenden71638
88.7%
38Amersham Town15914118
88.7%
39Farnham And Hedgerley25622630
88.3%
40Former Chalfont St Peter43338251
88.2%
41Grendon Underwood and The Claydons34304
88.2%
42Iver Heath16314320
87.7%
43Gerrards Cross30726938
87.6%
44Flackwell Heath and The Wooburns1,119978141
87.4%
45Former Chalfont St Giles55748770
87.4%
46Abbey917800117
87.2%
47Chesham South70619
87.1%
48Prestwood And Heath End13812018
87.0%
49Former Gerrards Cross55648076
86.3%
50Former Great Missenden35430549
86.2%
51Marsh and Micklefield31126744
85.9%
52Central15513322
85.8%
53Disraeli18315726
85.8%
54Chiltern Villages883757126
85.7%
55Amersham On The Hill13211319
85.6%
56Denham22118932
85.5%
57The Missendens15012822
85.3%
58Burnham Church And Beeches18916128
85.2%
59Iver Village And Richings Park20817731
85.1%
60Cholesbury, The Lee, Bellingdon12110318
85.1%
61Long Crendon20173
85.0%
62Totteridge and Bowerdean37031357
84.6%
63Former Iver37031357
84.6%
64Ivinghoe26224
84.6%
65Terriers and Amersham Hill48440777
84.1%
66Downley28323845
84.1%
67Former Little Chalfont & Amersham Common41635066
84.1%
68Austenwood1008416
84.0%
69Former Chiltern Ridges37831761
83.9%
70Beaconsfield21117734
83.9%
71Former Ridgeway East37316
83.8%
72Gerrards Cross North615110
83.6%
73Former Denham41734869
83.5%
74Chalfont St Peter1038617
83.5%
75Former Farnham Common & Burnham Beeches36230260
83.4%
76Ashley Green Latimer And Chenies1119219
82.9%
77Ridgeway23194
82.6%
78Burnham Church17143
82.4%
79Princes Risborough737606131
82.2%
80Former Chesham26822048
82.1%
81Booker and Cressex21617739
81.9%
82Amersham and Chesham Bois18415034
81.5%
83Stoke Poges16713631
81.4%
84Hilltop And Townsend977918
81.4%
85Wexham And Fulmer756114
81.3%
86Burnham Lent Rise And Taplow23419044
81.2%
87Former Cliveden31425559
81.2%
88Holmer Green957718
81.1%
89Aylesbury South East21174
81.0%
90Vale36297
80.6%
91Buckingham36297
80.6%
92Former Chess Valley34928168
80.5%
93Ridgeway West903726177
80.4%
94Former The Risboroughs30246
80.0%
95Asheridge Vale And Lowndes856817
80.0%
96Haddenham and Stone30246
80.0%
97Wexham And Iver West20164
80.0%
98Ridgeway East844670174
79.4%
99Former Stoke Poges & Wexham47137398
79.2%
100Former The Wooburns, Bourne End and Hedsor19154
78.9%
101Chesham North957520
78.9%
102Winslow19154
78.9%
103Newton Longville33267
78.8%
104Castlefield and Oakridge34326974
78.4%
105Chalfont St Giles and Little Chalfont22617749
78.3%
106Quainton23185
78.3%
107Iver13710730
78.1%
108Sands21016347
77.6%
109Newtown38299
76.3%
110Gerrards Cross and Denham24518758
76.3%
111Aylesbury North21165
76.2%
112Burnham15711938
75.8%
113Hedgerley And Fulmer24186
75.0%
114Waddesdon29218
72.4%
115Horwood25187
72.0%
116Farnhams and Stoke Poges18613353
71.5%
117Former Ridgeway West14104
71.4%
118Former Tylers Green and Loudwater14104
71.4%
119Former West Wycombe23158
65.2%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Taplow but face serious resistance in Former West Wycombe.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 34.8% gap separates the best and worst wards. Taplow approves 100.0% of applications while Former West Wycombe approves just 65.2%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

3,765 planning applications in Buckinghamshire have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check my postcode
Free · Property report emailed in minutes · Based on 3,780,000+ real decisions

More Buckinghamshire planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 25,837 planning decisions in Buckinghamshire, January 2020 to July 2026. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Buckinghamshire Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Buckinghamshire — Free