Data-backed planning intelligence · 2,500,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Buckinghamshire

Planning outcomes in Buckinghamshire are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 35.0% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

25,538 real decisions·118 wards·Updated March 2026
100.0%
Highest: Taplow
65.0%
Lowest: Horwood
35.0%
Gap
118
Wards
85.3% approved overall. But 3,754 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Buckinghamshire shifts your odds by up to 35.0%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Buckinghamshire

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 118 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Taplow11110
100.0%
2Berryfields, Buckingham Park and Watermead10100
100.0%
3Aylesbury North West10100
100.0%
4Aylesbury East13130
100.0%
5Denham South12120
100.0%
6Gerrards Cross East Denham South West29281
96.6%
7Wendover, Halton and Stoke Mandeville26251
96.2%
8Former Abbey21201
95.2%
9Former Marlow19181
94.7%
10Beaconsfield North1281217
94.5%
11Ballinger South Heath And Chartridge82775
93.9%
12Seer Green1131067
93.8%
13Gerrards Cross South72675
93.1%
14Long Crendon13121
92.3%
15Beaconsfield South18517015
91.9%
16Beaconsfield West22921019
91.7%
17Farnham Royal24222
91.7%
18Chalfont St Giles29026525
91.4%
19St Marys And Waterside12611511
91.3%
20Former Chiltern Villages34313
91.2%
21Gold Hill56515
91.1%
22Chesham Bois And Weedon Hill21219220
90.6%
23Amersham Common84768
90.5%
24Hazlemere62556560
90.4%
25Great Missenden73667
90.4%
26Former Beaconsfield63857563
90.1%
27Former Amersham and Chesham Bois39535639
90.1%
28Penn And Coleshill23020723
90.0%
29Aston Clinton and Weston Turville20182
90.0%
30Bierton, Kingsbrook and Wing19172
89.5%
31Penn, Tylers Green and Loudwater58151863
89.2%
32Marlow1,4711,311160
89.1%
33West Wycombe and Lane End32228735
89.1%
34Chalfont Common12911514
89.1%
35Little Chalfont17315419
89.0%
36Former Penn Wood & Old Amersham49443955
88.9%
37Little Missenden71638
88.7%
38Amersham Town15914118
88.7%
39Farnham And Hedgerley25622630
88.3%
40Former Chalfont St Peter43338251
88.2%
41Iver Heath16314320
87.7%
42Gerrards Cross30726938
87.6%
43Flackwell Heath and The Wooburns1,112972140
87.4%
44Former Chalfont St Giles55748770
87.4%
45Abbey908791117
87.1%
46Prestwood And Heath End13812018
87.0%
47Chesham South66579
86.4%
48Former Gerrards Cross55648076
86.3%
49Former Great Missenden35430549
86.2%
50Central15513322
85.8%
51Marsh and Micklefield30926544
85.8%
52Chiltern Villages877752125
85.7%
53Disraeli18115526
85.6%
54Amersham On The Hill13211319
85.6%
55Denham22118932
85.5%
56Burnham Church And Beeches18916128
85.2%
57Cholesbury, The Lee, Bellingdon12110318
85.1%
58Iver Village And Richings Park20917732
84.7%
59Former Iver37031357
84.6%
60Grendon Underwood and The Claydons26224
84.6%
61Totteridge and Bowerdean36831157
84.5%
62The Missendens14212022
84.5%
63Downley28323845
84.1%
64Austenwood1008416
84.0%
65Terriers and Amersham Hill47740077
83.9%
66Former Chiltern Ridges37831761
83.9%
67Former Little Chalfont & Amersham Common41735067
83.9%
68Former Ridgeway East37316
83.8%
69Gerrards Cross North615110
83.6%
70Former Farnham Common & Burnham Beeches36230260
83.4%
71Former Denham41834870
83.3%
72Ashley Green Latimer And Chenies1119219
82.9%
73Beaconsfield19816434
82.8%
74Ridgeway23194
82.6%
75Haddenham and Stone23194
82.6%
76Burnham Church17143
82.4%
77Former Chesham26822048
82.1%
78Booker and Cressex21517639
81.9%
79Princes Risborough732598134
81.7%
80Chalfont St Peter937617
81.7%
81Amersham and Chesham Bois17814533
81.5%
82Stoke Poges16713631
81.4%
83Hilltop And Townsend977918
81.4%
84Wexham And Fulmer756114
81.3%
85Burnham Lent Rise And Taplow23419044
81.2%
86Former Cliveden31425559
81.2%
87Winslow16133
81.2%
88Holmer Green957718
81.1%
89Ivinghoe21174
81.0%
90Vale36297
80.6%
91Ridgeway West896721175
80.5%
92Former Chess Valley34928168
80.5%
93Former The Risboroughs30246
80.0%
94Asheridge Vale And Lowndes856817
80.0%
95Wexham And Iver West20164
80.0%
96Ridgeway East836662174
79.2%
97Former Stoke Poges & Wexham47237399
79.0%
98Former The Wooburns, Bourne End and Hedsor19154
78.9%
99Castlefield and Oakridge34026773
78.5%
100Aylesbury North18144
77.8%
101Sands20716047
77.3%
102Chesham North886820
77.3%
103Chalfont St Giles and Little Chalfont21516649
77.2%
104Iver1299930
76.7%
105Buckingham30237
76.7%
106Quainton17134
76.5%
107Newtown38299
76.3%
108Gerrards Cross and Denham23017456
75.7%
109Hedgerley And Fulmer24186
75.0%
110Newton Longville28217
75.0%
111Aylesbury South East16124
75.0%
112Burnham14911138
74.5%
113Former Ridgeway West14104
71.4%
114Former Tylers Green and Loudwater14104
71.4%
115Waddesdon24177
70.8%
116Farnhams and Stoke Poges17512352
70.3%
117Former West Wycombe23158
65.2%
118Horwood20137
65.0%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Taplow but face serious resistance in Horwood.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 35.0% gap separates the best and worst wards. Taplow approves 100.0% of applications while Horwood approves just 65.0%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

3,754 planning applications in Buckinghamshire have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A £79 report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check My Postcode First
Free instant check · Pro Report £79 · Based on 2,500,000+ real decisions

More Buckinghamshire planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 25,538 planning decisions in Buckinghamshire, January 2020 to present. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Buckinghamshire Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Buckinghamshire — Free