Data-backed planning intelligence · 3,850,000+ decisions analysed across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland
PlanningLens

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Buckinghamshire

Planning outcomes in Buckinghamshire are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 34.8% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

18,396 real decisions·120 wards·Updated October 2026
100.0%
Highest: Taplow
65.2%
Lowest: Former West Wycombe
34.8%
Gap
120
Wards
85.4% approved overall. But 2,680 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Buckinghamshire shifts your odds by up to 34.8%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Buckinghamshire

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 120 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Taplow11110
100.0%
2Berryfields, Buckingham Park and Watermead13130
100.0%
3Aylesbury East27270
100.0%
4Denham South12120
100.0%
5Gerrards Cross East Denham South West29281
96.6%
6Former Abbey21201
95.2%
7Aylesbury North West20191
95.0%
8Former Marlow19181
94.7%
9Beaconsfield North1281217
94.5%
10Ballinger South Heath And Chartridge82775
93.9%
11Seer Green1131067
93.8%
12Aylesbury South West15141
93.3%
13Wendover, Halton and Stoke Mandeville45423
93.3%
14Gerrards Cross South72675
93.1%
15Beaconsfield West22721017
92.5%
16Aston Clinton and Weston Turville39363
92.3%
17Beaconsfield South18517015
91.9%
18Farnham Royal24222
91.7%
19Chalfont St Giles29026525
91.4%
20St Marys And Waterside12611511
91.3%
21Former Chiltern Villages34313
91.2%
22Gold Hill56515
91.1%
23Chesham Bois And Weedon Hill21219220
90.6%
24Amersham Common84768
90.5%
25Great Missenden73667
90.4%
26Former Beaconsfield63657561
90.4%
27Hazlemere65459064
90.2%
28Former Amersham and Chesham Bois39635739
90.2%
29Penn And Coleshill23020723
90.0%
30Marlow1,5361,371165
89.3%
31West Wycombe and Lane End33129536
89.1%
32Chalfont Common12911514
89.1%
33Little Chalfont17315419
89.0%
34Former Penn Wood & Old Amersham49644155
88.9%
35Penn, Tylers Green and Loudwater61954970
88.7%
36Little Missenden71638
88.7%
37Amersham Town15914118
88.7%
38Farnham And Hedgerley25622630
88.3%
39Former Chalfont St Peter43438351
88.2%
40Iver Heath16314320
87.7%
41Gerrards Cross30726938
87.6%
42Grendon Underwood and The Claydons48426
87.5%
43Former Chalfont St Giles55748770
87.4%
44Flackwell Heath and The Wooburns1,144999145
87.3%
45Abbey931811120
87.1%
46Prestwood And Heath End13812018
87.0%
47Aylesbury West15132
86.7%
48Former Gerrards Cross55648076
86.3%
49Ivinghoe51447
86.3%
50Chiltern Villages919792127
86.2%
51Former Great Missenden35430549
86.2%
52Chesham South877512
86.2%
53Bierton, Kingsbrook and Wing36315
86.1%
54Marsh and Micklefield31527144
86.0%
55Central15513322
85.8%
56Amersham On The Hill13211319
85.6%
57Denham22118932
85.5%
58The Missendens19316528
85.5%
59Long Crendon34295
85.3%
60Burnham Church And Beeches18916128
85.2%
61Iver Village And Richings Park20817731
85.1%
62Cholesbury, The Lee, Bellingdon12110318
85.1%
63Disraeli18615828
84.9%
64Former Iver37131457
84.6%
65Terriers and Amersham Hill49841979
84.1%
66Totteridge and Bowerdean37731760
84.1%
67Austenwood1008416
84.0%
68Former Chiltern Ridges37831761
83.9%
69Former Little Chalfont & Amersham Common41735067
83.9%
70Former Ridgeway East37316
83.8%
71Downley28924247
83.7%
72Gerrards Cross North615110
83.6%
73Former Denham41834969
83.5%
74Former Farnham Common & Burnham Beeches36230260
83.4%
75Beaconsfield25120942
83.3%
76Chalfont St Peter13010822
83.1%
77Buckingham594910
83.1%
78Ashley Green Latimer And Chenies1119219
82.9%
79Amersham and Chesham Bois22018238
82.7%
80Ridgeway23194
82.6%
81Booker and Cressex22818840
82.5%
82Burnham Church17143
82.4%
83Former Chesham26922148
82.2%
84Quainton39327
82.1%
85Princes Risborough757621136
82.0%
86Haddenham and Stone50419
82.0%
87Newton Longville49409
81.6%
88Stoke Poges16713631
81.4%
89Hilltop And Townsend977918
81.4%
90Wexham And Fulmer756114
81.3%
91Former Cliveden31525659
81.3%
92Chesham North12310023
81.3%
93Burnham Lent Rise And Taplow23419044
81.2%
94Aylesbury South East32266
81.2%
95Holmer Green957718
81.1%
96Horwood37307
81.1%
97Waddesdon47389
80.9%
98Vale36297
80.6%
99Former Chess Valley35028268
80.6%
100Ridgeway West922742180
80.5%
101Former The Risboroughs30246
80.0%
102Asheridge Vale And Lowndes856817
80.0%
103Wexham And Iver West20164
80.0%
104Ridgeway East873694179
79.5%
105Iver16012733
79.4%
106Aylesbury North34277
79.4%
107Former Stoke Poges & Wexham47137398
79.2%
108Former The Wooburns, Bourne End and Hedsor19154
78.9%
109Castlefield and Oakridge34927574
78.8%
110Winslow23185
78.3%
111Chalfont St Giles and Little Chalfont25119655
78.1%
112Gerrards Cross and Denham28822464
77.8%
113Burnham18814642
77.7%
114Sands21416648
77.6%
115Newtown38299
76.3%
116Hedgerley And Fulmer24186
75.0%
117Farnhams and Stoke Poges22216062
72.1%
118Former Ridgeway West14104
71.4%
119Former Tylers Green and Loudwater14104
71.4%
120Former West Wycombe23158
65.2%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Taplow but face serious resistance in Former West Wycombe.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 34.8% gap separates the best and worst wards. Taplow approves 100.0% of applications while Former West Wycombe approves just 65.2%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

2,680 planning applications in Buckinghamshire have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check my postcode
Free · Property report emailed in minutes · Based on 3,850,000+ real decisions

More Buckinghamshire planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 18,396 planning decisions in Buckinghamshire, January 2020 to October 2026. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Buckinghamshire Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Buckinghamshire — Free