Data-backed planning intelligence · 3,770,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Hammersmith & Fulham

Planning outcomes in Hammersmith & Fulham are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 16.0% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

19,544 real decisions·51 wards·Updated August 2026
100.0%
Highest: College Park And Old
84.0%
Lowest: NEND
16.0%
Gap
51
Wards
92.2% approved overall. But 1,521 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Hammersmith & Fulham shifts your odds by up to 16.0%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Hammersmith & Fulham

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 51 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1College Park And Old Oak11110
100.0%
2WORMHOLT AND WHITE CITY1231230
100.0%
3Parsons Green And Sandford25250
100.0%
4Walham Green10100
100.0%
5Hammersmith Broadway10100
100.0%
6Fulham Reach12120
100.0%
7Munster10100
100.0%
8Brook Green14140
100.0%
9HAMMERSMITH BROADWAY3243231
99.7%
10FULHAM BROADWAY3223211
99.7%
11ADDISON2242231
99.6%
12NORTH END1791781
99.4%
13SHEPHERD'S BUSH GREEN3583553
99.2%
14RAVENSCOURT PARK2472452
99.2%
15FULHAM REACH2242222
99.1%
16MUNSTER2232203
98.7%
17PARSONS GREEN AND WALHAM2252223
98.7%
18SANDS END2072043
98.6%
19AVONMORE AND BROOK GREEN1951914
97.9%
20PALACE RIVERSIDE95932
97.9%
21COLLEGE PARK AND OLD OAK1231203
97.6%
22Palace And Hurlingham22211
95.5%
23WHITEC27626313
95.3%
24GROVE39337419
95.2%
25BROOKG42940425
94.2%
26CONIGH32830622
93.3%
27AVONMO61257042
93.1%
28PGS49546134
93.1%
29SANDSE1,02094377
92.5%
30COLLP85078565
92.4%
31TOWN85979267
92.2%
32HAMBRO47744037
92.2%
33WENDPK27925722
92.1%
34WKENSI30528124
92.1%
35PGW82876167
91.9%
36PALHUR70965158
91.8%
37FULTOW37234131
91.7%
38ASKEW68362558
91.5%
39FREACH85978079
90.8%
40PALACE45441143
90.5%
41RAVENS83875484
90.0%
42HBROAD65058565
90.0%
43LILLIE24221725
89.7%
44SBG77468787
88.8%
45WORMH43838850
88.6%
46MUNSTE1,086956130
88.0%
47ADDISO62454876
87.8%
48FBROAD58751572
87.7%
49WALGR33829543
87.3%
50AVON18816325
86.7%
51NEND27523144
84.0%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in College Park And Old Oak but face serious resistance in NEND.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 16.0% gap separates the best and worst wards. College Park And Old Oak approves 100.0% of applications while NEND approves just 84.0%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

1,521 planning applications in Hammersmith & Fulham have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check my postcode
Free · Property report emailed in minutes · Based on 3,770,000+ real decisions

More Hammersmith & Fulham planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 19,544 planning decisions in Hammersmith & Fulham, January 2020 to August 2026. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Hammersmith & Fulham Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Hammersmith & Fulham — Free