Data-backed planning intelligence · 3,290,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in Rugby

Planning outcomes in Rugby are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 18.2% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

13,816 real decisions·23 wards·Updated June 2026
100.0%
Highest: Coton & Boughton, Cl
81.8%
Lowest: Hillmorton, Paddox
18.2%
Gap
23
Wards
94.0% approved overall. But 827 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in Rugby shifts your odds by up to 18.2%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in Rugby

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 23 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Coton & Boughton, Clifton, Newton & Churchover13130
100.0%
2Admirals & Cawston, Bilton13130
100.0%
3Eastlands, Paddox10100
100.0%
4Rokeby & Overslade41840711
97.4%
5Paddox75172724
96.8%
6Bilton57255319
96.7%
7Eastlands89085535
96.1%
8Newbold & Brownsover56253824
95.7%
9Bilton, Rokeby & Overslade21201
95.2%
10Wolston & the Lawfords86782146
94.7%
11Dunsmore1,8681,763105
94.4%
12Coton & Boughton33831919
94.4%
13Clifton, Newton & Churchover56953435
93.8%
14Admirals & Cawston34732324
93.1%
15Benn73468054
92.6%
16Hillmorton55151041
92.6%
17New Bilton38235329
92.4%
18Leam Valley80473569
91.4%
19Revel & Binley Woods1,5111,372139
90.8%
20Clifton, Newton & Churchover, Hillmorton1091
90.0%
21Bilton, Dunsmore27243
88.9%
22Wolvey & Shilton64556184
87.0%
23Hillmorton, Paddox1192
81.8%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Coton & Boughton, Clifton, Newton & Churchover but face serious resistance in Hillmorton, Paddox.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 18.2% gap separates the best and worst wards. Coton & Boughton, Clifton, Newton & Churchover approves 100.0% of applications while Hillmorton, Paddox approves just 81.8%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

827 planning applications in Rugby have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check my postcode
Free · Property report emailed in minutes · Based on 3,290,000+ real decisions

More Rugby planning data

Nearby councils ward breakdowns

Methodology: Covers 13,816 planning decisions in Rugby, January 2020 to present. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from Rugby Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in Rugby — Free