Planning outcomes in Rugby are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 18.2% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.
See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.
| # | Ward | Decisions | Approved | Refused | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coton & Boughton, Clifton, Newton & Churchover | 13 | 13 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 2 | Admirals & Cawston, Bilton | 13 | 13 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 3 | Eastlands, Paddox | 10 | 10 | 0 | 100.0% |
| 4 | Rokeby & Overslade | 418 | 407 | 11 | 97.4% |
| 5 | Paddox | 751 | 727 | 24 | 96.8% |
| 6 | Bilton | 572 | 553 | 19 | 96.7% |
| 7 | Eastlands | 890 | 855 | 35 | 96.1% |
| 8 | Newbold & Brownsover | 562 | 538 | 24 | 95.7% |
| 9 | Bilton, Rokeby & Overslade | 21 | 20 | 1 | 95.2% |
| 10 | Wolston & the Lawfords | 867 | 821 | 46 | 94.7% |
| 11 | Dunsmore | 1,868 | 1,763 | 105 | 94.4% |
| 12 | Coton & Boughton | 338 | 319 | 19 | 94.4% |
| 13 | Clifton, Newton & Churchover | 569 | 534 | 35 | 93.8% |
| 14 | Admirals & Cawston | 347 | 323 | 24 | 93.1% |
| 15 | Benn | 734 | 680 | 54 | 92.6% |
| 16 | Hillmorton | 551 | 510 | 41 | 92.6% |
| 17 | New Bilton | 382 | 353 | 29 | 92.4% |
| 18 | Leam Valley | 804 | 735 | 69 | 91.4% |
| 19 | Revel & Binley Woods | 1,511 | 1,372 | 139 | 90.8% |
| 20 | Clifton, Newton & Churchover, Hillmorton | 10 | 9 | 1 | 90.0% |
| 21 | Bilton, Dunsmore | 27 | 24 | 3 | 88.9% |
| 22 | Wolvey & Shilton | 645 | 561 | 84 | 87.0% |
| 23 | Hillmorton, Paddox | 11 | 9 | 2 | 81.8% |
An extension might sail through in Coton & Boughton, Clifton, Newton & Churchover but face serious resistance in Hillmorton, Paddox.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.
827 planning applications in Rugby have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.
Check my postcode