Data-backed planning intelligence · 3,290,000+ decisions analysed across England

Planning Approval Rates by Ward in South Norfolk

Planning outcomes in South Norfolk are highly localised. The gap between the most and least permissive wards is 26.7% — that's not noise, it's a fundamentally different planning environment depending on where you live.

4,579 real decisions·44 wards·Updated June 2026
100.0%
Highest: Easton
73.3%
Lowest: Reepham
26.7%
Gap
44
Wards
96.0% approved overall. But 183 applications refused since 2020. Where you live in South Norfolk shifts your odds by up to 26.7%. The council average doesn't tell you which side of that gap you're on.

Check Planning Approval Patterns in South Norfolk

See your ward's approval rate and nearby planning decisions — free and instant.

Check My Postcode

All 44 wards ranked

#WardDecisionsApprovedRefusedRate
1Easton45450
100.0%
2Stratton60600
100.0%
3Marshes10100
100.0%
4Sprowston East15150
100.0%
5Hellesdon North West12120
100.0%
6North Wymondham69681
98.6%
7Bunwell1651623
98.2%
8Hempnall1681653
98.2%
9Ditchingham And Earsham2112074
98.1%
10Thurlton1081062
98.1%
11Aylsham53521
98.1%
12New Costessey84822
97.6%
13Beck Vale, Dickleburgh And Scole2732667
97.4%
14Mulbarton And Stoke Holy Cross2862788
97.2%
15Loddon And Chedgrave2062006
97.1%
16Bressingham And Burston1941886
96.9%
17Wicklewood1491445
96.6%
18Forncett1371325
96.4%
19Hingham And Deopham1071034
96.3%
20Rockland1561506
96.2%
21Old Costessey52502
96.2%
22Diss And Roydon26525411
95.8%
23Brooke1991909
95.5%
24Newton Flotman1121075
95.5%
25Harleston1291236
95.3%
26Poringland, Framinghams And Trowse22721611
95.2%
27Central Wymondham1591518
95.0%
28Hethersett1771689
94.9%
29Great Witchingham1311247
94.7%
30South Wymondham1281217
94.5%
31Cringleford1611529
94.4%
32Old Catton And Sprowston West18171
94.4%
33Eynesford84786
92.9%
34Sprowston Central11101
90.9%
35Brundall21192
90.5%
36Wroxham36324
88.9%
37Blofield With South Walsham16142
87.5%
38Buxton14122
85.7%
39Taverham North13112
84.6%
40Thorpe St Andrew North West12102
83.3%
41Thorpe St Andrew South East1192
81.8%
42Hevingham1082
80.0%
43Spixworth With St Faiths1082
80.0%
44Reepham15114
73.3%
See how this applies to your postcode →

These are council averages. Your property is specific.

An extension might sail through in Easton but face serious resistance in Reepham.
Check your postcode to see what actually happens near your address.

Check My Postcode

What the data tells us

1
A 26.7% gap separates the best and worst wards. Easton approves 100.0% of applications while Reepham approves just 73.3%. That's a fundamentally different planning environment.
2
High volume doesn't mean high approval. Some of the busiest wards aren't the most permissive. The number of applications a ward processes tells you nothing about how likely yours is to succeed.
3
Ward averages are a starting point, not a guarantee. Your specific outcome depends on your property, your neighbours, your proposal type and the comparable decisions near your address.

Before you spend £5,000+ on architects and drawings

183 planning applications in South Norfolk have been refused since 2020. Many of those homeowners had already paid for drawings and application fees. A free, property-specific report shows you what gets approved — and what gets refused — near your property.

Check my postcode
Free · Property report emailed in minutes · Based on 3,290,000+ real decisions

More South Norfolk planning data

Methodology: Covers 4,579 planning decisions in South Norfolk, January 2020 to present. Approval rate = approved / (approved + refused). Pending, withdrawn and invalid excluded. Ward boundaries reflect current electoral divisions. Data from South Norfolk Council's public planning portal. Full methodology →
Check planning approval patterns in South Norfolk — Free