Redbridge Council approves 78.6% of planning applications, based on 33,383 real decisions analysed from the council’s public planning portal. The national average across all councils tracked by PlanningLens is 88.6%. Redbridge sits 10.0 percentage points below the national average.
According to PlanningLens analysis of 3,675 decided applications, Redbridge Council approved 79.9% of planning applications in 2025. Across 33,383 decisions analysed since January 2020, the overall approval rate in Redbridge is 78.6%; the national average across UK councils tracked by PlanningLens is 88.6%.
Source: PlanningLens (planninglens.co.uk) analysis of Redbridge council planning portal records · Updated August 2026 · Quote freely with attribution
Enter your postcode for a free, personalised approval pattern report, based on your ward and application type.
Not all applications are treated equally. Extension types, listed building consent, and change of use applications each have very different success rates in Redbridge.
| Application Type | Approved | Refused | Total | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | 25,071 | 6,890 | 31,961 | 78.4% |
| Prior Approval | 810 | 186 | 996 | 81.3% |
| Full | 345 | 81 | 426 | 81.0% |
A loft conversion in one ward can have a 90% approval rate. In the next ward, 55%. The free check tells you which side you're on, your free property report is emailed in minutes.
Check My PostcodeWard-level data reveals where planning applications are most and least likely to succeed. Officers, local policies, and neighbourhood character all play a role.
| Ward | Approved | Refused | Total | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monkhams | 1,376 | 335 | 1,711 | 80.4% |
| Wanstead Village | 1,192 | 318 | 1,510 | 78.9% |
| Fullwell | 1,152 | 351 | 1,503 | 76.6% |
| Valentines | 1,055 | 307 | 1,362 | 77.5% |
| South Woodford | 1,029 | 293 | 1,322 | 77.8% |
| Barkingside | 997 | 315 | 1,312 | 76.0% |
| Clayhall | 1,020 | 287 | 1,307 | 78.0% |
| Mayfield | 957 | 342 | 1,299 | 73.7% |
| Goodmayes | 1,047 | 244 | 1,291 | 81.1% |
| Cranbrook | 922 | 324 | 1,246 | 74.0% |
| Bridge | 950 | 285 | 1,235 | 76.9% |
| Seven Kings | 898 | 240 | 1,138 | 78.9% |
| Aldborough | 881 | 230 | 1,111 | 79.3% |
| Fairlop | 858 | 240 | 1,098 | 78.1% |
| Wanstead Park | 881 | 208 | 1,089 | 80.9% |
| Newbury | 827 | 249 | 1,076 | 76.9% |
| Churchfields | 807 | 238 | 1,045 | 77.2% |
| Chadwell | 790 | 234 | 1,024 | 77.1% |
| Clementswood | 776 | 181 | 957 | 81.1% |
| Hainault | 758 | 157 | 915 | 82.8% |
| Loxford | 633 | 187 | 820 | 77.2% |
| Ilford Town | 554 | 166 | 720 | 76.9% |
| Church End | 213 | 23 | 236 | 90.3% |
| Snaresbrook | 190 | 41 | 231 | 82.3% |
| Wanstead | 137 | 29 | 166 | 82.5% |
Showing top 25 of 26 wards by volume. Your free property report includes the full ward breakdown.
See full ward breakdown →How Redbridge’s planning approval rate has changed year by year, up 13.9pp since 2018.
Bar height reflects approval rate. Colour: green ≥85%, amber ≥70%, red below 70%.
Real residential planning decisions from Redbridge council. Each reference links to the council's own planning portal so you can verify the details yourself.
| Reference | Proposal | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| 1526/26 | Extension to existing basement with lightwells (summary) | Approved |
| 0393/26 | Retention and extension of existing outbuilding including rear wall to provide a | Refused |
| 1661/26 | Single storey rear extension. Alterations to fenestrations including new bay wi | Approved |
| 1653/26 | Detached rear outbuilding. (Summary) | Approved |
| 1836/26 | Single storey rear extension with a depth of 6.00 metres, highest point of 3.50 | Approved |
| 1839/26 | Single storey rear extension with a depth of 6.00 metres, highest point of 3.20 | Approved |
| 1808/26 | Replacement and installation of external plant (summary) | Approved |
| 1900/26 | Single storey rear extension with a depth of 6.00 metres, highest point of 3.00 | Approved |
| 1917/26 | Single storey rear extension with a depth of 6.00 metres, highest point of 3.50 | Approved |
| 1625/26 | Single storey rear extension with a depth of 4.92 metres, highest point of 3.04 | Approved |
Find out what actually gets approved near your address first. Your free property report analyses the 20 nearest decisions to your property, ward-specific refusal patterns, and extension-by-extension approval patterns. Based on Redbridge's 33,383 real decisions. Free, emailed in minutes.
Check my postcodeCompare Redbridge's planning approval rates with neighbouring areas:
Dig deeper into Redbridge's planning statistics, by ward, extension type, or project category:
Data-driven guides to help you understand planning approval patterns:
Yes. PlanningLens offers a free planning permission check for Redbridge. Enter your postcode to instantly see approval rates for your ward and application type, based on 33,383 real decisions from Redbridge council. The full property-specific report is also free and emailed within minutes.
Enter your postcode on PlanningLens for a free instant check based on Redbridge's real planning decisions. The free property report goes further: it analyses the 20 nearest comparable decisions to your property, ward-level refusal patterns, and approval rates by application type. Free and emailed within minutes.
Based on 33,383 planning decisions, the overall approval rate in Redbridge is 78.6%. The national average across councils tracked by PlanningLens is 88.6%. Rates vary significantly by ward and application type.
PlanningLens has analysed 33,383 planning decisions from Redbridge council. 26,226 were approved and 7,157 were refused. These figures cover decisions from January 2020 to the present.
The average approval rate in Redbridge is 78.6%, but outcomes depend heavily on your specific ward, the type of extension or development you are proposing, and local planning policy. Use the free PlanningLens postcode check to get a personalised score.
Writing about planning in Redbridge? These figures are free to republish with attribution. Copy the one-line citation, or paste the stat box into any website, CMS or newsletter, it carries its own styling and links back to this page for verification.